What Are The Three Types Of Defenses?
Discover the three types of defenses in criminal law — affirmative, procedural, and substantive — with practical examples and Utah-specific details to protect your rights effectively.
Legal systems can often seem intimidating, especially when it comes to understanding how defenses work in criminal cases. If you’re in Utah and find yourself facing criminal charges, it’s crucial to know that the law provides several types of defenses that you can use to protect your rights. Whether you live in Salt Lake City or smaller communities like Provo, the principles and regulations guiding these defenses are pretty consistent across the state. We’ll be walking you through the three main types of defenses recognized under Utah law, illustrated with real statutes and practical examples to clarify these complex legal concepts.
What Are The Three Types Of Defenses?
Understanding the legal realm can often feel overwhelming, especially when you’re trying to defend your rights or the rights of a loved one. One of the fundamental aspects of criminal law defense is understanding the three primary types of defenses: affirmative defenses, procedural defenses, and substantive defenses. In Utah, these defenses can be complex, but knowing them can empower you to face legal challenges confidently. In this article, we’ll delve into these three types of defenses, supported by examples and real Utah laws to make the content relatable and actionable.
Affirmative Defenses
Affirmative defenses are a category of defense where you, as the defendant, acknowledge the prosecution’s claims but introduce additional info that might absolve you from liability. Essentially, you’re not denying the criminal act but instead, justifying, excusing, or claiming an exemption for it. In Utah, some affirmative defenses are stipulated under the law.
Self-Defense
One of the most recognized affirmative defenses is self-defense. Utah Code § 76–2–402 outlines the conditions under which an individual may justifiably use force. For instance, if someone in Salt Lake City felt they were in immediate danger and used reasonable force to protect themselves, this could be considered self-defense.
Insanity Defense
The insanity defense is another affirmative defense covered under Utah Code § 76–2–305. In this case, if an individual in Weber County commits a crime but was suffering from a severe mental disease or defect that rendered them incapable of distinguishing between right and wrong, they might be excused from legal responsibility.
Entrapment
Entrapment, defined under Utah Code § 76–2–303, occurs when a person is induced by a law enforcement officer to commit a crime they otherwise would not have committed. For example, if a resident of Provo was coerced into committing a theft due to misleading actions by an undercover officer, this defense might be applicable.
Procedural Defenses
Procedural defenses focus on whether the legal proceedings themselves adhered to the rules and laws. It’s less about the crime and more about ensuring due process.
Unlawful Search and Seizure
If evidence is obtained through an unlawful search or seizure, it can be challenged using procedural defense. According to Utah Code § 77–7–15, law enforcement must follow strict guidelines when conducting searches. If an Orem resident had their home searched without a warrant or probable cause, their attorney could file a motion to suppress any evidence gathered unlawfully.
Right to a Speedy Trial
Under the Sixth Amendment and mirrored in the Utah Constitution, defendants have the right to a speedy trial. If there are unnecessary delays in bringing a case to trial, a procedural defense can be used. For example, a Tooele County case dragging on without a valid reason could be grounds for dismissal based on the speedy trial right.
Double Jeopardy
Double jeopardy, prohibited by the Fifth Amendment and Utah Code § 76–1–402, prevents an individual from being tried twice for the same offense. If someone from Clearfield was acquitted of a burglary charge, they cannot be tried again for the same incident.
Substantive Defenses
Substantive defenses challenge the distinction that the alleged crime meets the legal definition required for a conviction. Essentially, they’re saying, “I did not commit a crime because one of the crime’s elements is missing.”
Alibi
An alibi is a classic substantive defense. If you were in a different location when the crime occurred, this defense applies. Let’s say you’re accused of vandalism in Saint George but have evidence you were attending a concert in another city; presenting this alibi could lead to your acquittal.
Mistake of Fact
A mistake of fact can serve as a defense if it negates the intent required for a crime. For instance, if a Park City resident mistakenly picked up someone else’s bag at the gym believing it was their own, this absence of intent to steal could form the basis of a substantive defense.
Lack of Intent
Many crimes require a specific intent to be proven for a conviction. If intent cannot be proven, this defense is valid. Suppose an individual in Logan accidentally damaged their neighbor’s property while trimming a tree. If their intent was merely to maintain their yard, this lack of criminal intent could serve as a defense.
┌──────────────────────────────┬──────────────────────────────┐
│ Defense Type │ Description │
├──────────────────────────────┼──────────────────────────────┤
│ Affirmative Defense │ Acknowledge the act but │
│ │ provide a justification or │
│ │ excuse │
├──────────────────────────────┼──────────────────────────────┤
│ Procedural Defense │ Focuses on whether the legal │
│ │ process adhered to rules │
├──────────────────────────────┼──────────────────────────────┤
│ Substantive Defense │ Challenges the crime's legal │
│ │ definition or required │
│ │ elements │
└──────────────────────────────┴──────────────────────────────┘Why It Matters
Understanding these defenses is crucial in everyday life because they protect your rights and ensure justice. For example, knowing your right to a procedural defense can prevent unlawful infringements on your freedom. Similarly, embracing affirmative defenses like self-defense ensures you’re protected in perilous situations.
Practical Applications
Imagine you’re a resident of West Jordan, and you face charges of theft. Knowing the differences between procedural and substantive defenses can help you make informed decisions. For instance, if you were coerced into committing the act, an entrapment defense might be applicable. Alternatively, if the evidence against you was obtained unlawfully, procedural defenses could be your primary line of action.
If you want to learn more about your rights and defenses, you can check out this article about West Jordan Lawyer Jeremy Eveland.
Common Misconceptions
- All defenses are the same: Many people believe all defenses operate similarly in court, but as we’ve discussed, there are distinct differences.
- Self-defense is always valid: While self-defense is a common affirmative defense, it’s only applicable under specific circumstances outlined in Utah law.
- You can always use an alibi: An alibi must be verifiable and credible to serve as a substantive defense. False alibis can lead to severe legal consequences.
- Procedural defenses are loopholes: Procedural defenses protect the integrity of the legal process to ensure justice is fairly administered.
Actionable Insights
- Know your rights: Familiarize yourself with Utah Codes like § 76–2–402 for self-defense or § 77–7–15 for lawful searches.
- Evaluate evidence: Assess the evidence against you. Was it lawfully obtained? Does it conclusively prove all elements of the crime?
- Consult an attorney: Legal experts such as Jeremy Eveland can help you navigate these complex defenses effectively.
FAQs
Q: What is the difference between affirmative and substantive defenses?
A: Affirmative defenses acknowledge the act but justify or excuse it, while substantive defenses challenge whether the crime meets necessary legal elements.
Q: Can procedural defenses lead to case dismissals?
A: Yes, procedural defenses can result in case dismissals if critical legal processes were not adhered to, such as unlawful searches or violation of the right to a speedy trial.
Q: Is an insanity defense commonly used in Utah?
A: Insanity defenses are not commonly used due to the stringent requirements under Utah Code § 76–2–305, but they are crucial in cases involving severe mental disorders.
Q: How can I prove an alibi?
A: Providing credible evidence such as witness testimonies, video footage, or other documentation that confirms your presence elsewhere during the crime can establish a solid alibi.
Final Takeaway
Navigating legal challenges can be daunting, but understanding the three main types of defenses — affirmative, procedural, and substantive — empowers you with the knowledge to protect your rights effectively. If you find yourself facing a legal battle and need expert advice, don’t hesitate to speak with a criminal defense attorney. Call Jeremy Eveland, Utah Lawyer, at (801) 613–1472.
Remember to clap this article, leave a comment, and subscribe to our Medium newsletter for more updates!
Jeremy Eveland 8833 S Redwood Rd West Jordan Utah 84088 (801) 613–1472
The information contained in this article is for information purposes only and is not legal advice. For legal advice, hire a competent lawyer in your jurisdiction.
